Skip to content
GitLab
Projects Groups Topics Snippets
  • /
  • Help
    • Help
    • Support
    • Community forum
    • Submit feedback
  • Sign in
  • P PathoFact
  • Project information
    • Project information
    • Activity
    • Labels
    • Members
  • Repository
    • Repository
    • Files
    • Commits
    • Branches
    • Tags
    • Contributor statistics
    • Graph
    • Compare revisions
    • Locked files
  • Issues 25
    • Issues 25
    • List
    • Boards
    • Service Desk
    • Milestones
    • Requirements
  • Merge requests 0
    • Merge requests 0
  • CI/CD
    • CI/CD
    • Pipelines
    • Jobs
    • Schedules
    • Test cases
  • Deployments
    • Deployments
    • Environments
    • Releases
  • Packages and registries
    • Packages and registries
    • Package Registry
    • Container Registry
    • Terraform modules
  • Monitor
    • Monitor
    • Incidents
  • Analytics
    • Analytics
    • Value stream
    • CI/CD
    • Code review
    • Insights
    • Issue
    • Repository
  • Wiki
    • Wiki
  • External wiki
    • External wiki
  • Snippets
    • Snippets
  • Activity
  • Graph
  • Create a new issue
  • Jobs
  • Commits
  • Issue Boards
Collapse sidebar
  • Laura Denies
  • PathoFact
  • Issues
  • #2
Closed
Open
Issue created Apr 08, 2020 by Christiane Hassenrück@chassenr

PathoFact for metagenome assembled genomes (MAGs)

Hi @laura.denies

I am quite new to the analysis of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance genes, and I have been looking for a suitable tool to search for these genes also in MAGs. Your tool looks very promising. If I understood your approach correctly, PathoFact takes as input the assembly (i.e. contigs) and the predicted ORF before the binning step. Would it also be possible to run PathoFact on the binned genomes (MAGs)? Would the performance of the tool be reduced by having less complex input (i.e. MAGs instead of the full metagenome assembly)?

Thanks a lot for your advise!

Kind regards, Christiane

Assignee
Assign to
Time tracking